Canonical definitions
Terms ZEODEC uses precisely.
These definitions distinguish ZEODEC products from adjacent categories such as authorization, policy enforcement, generic agent governance, optimization and analytics.
ClaimPrism governed review
ClaimPrism detects and prioritizes environmental marketing claims, keeps evidence and review context attached to the relevant wording, and supports an explicit human governance decision. Detection and risk prioritization are review signals, not automated legal or regulatory conclusions.
Claim languageClaim type / risk signalEvidence contextReviewer attentionLifecycle stateExplainable review decision
See the canonical ClaimPrism proof case →
ARRM economic release control
ARRM compares caller-provided baseline and candidate measurements for matching scenarios and applies explicit deterministic metric direction, threshold and evidence rules. The release result is PASS, WARN or FAIL, mapped to PROCEED, REVIEW or BLOCK. ARRM does not place an LLM in the decision path and does not invent or automatically collect the measurements.
Baseline evidenceCandidate evidenceMatched scenarioMetric directionThresholdsMaterial regressionPASS / WARN / FAILPROCEED / REVIEW / BLOCK
See the canonical ARRM proof case →
Order Resolution governed path
Order Resolution separates evidence support, authorization and execution truth. A supported target price does not itself create authority, and approval does not itself prove an ERP mutation occurred.
Exception signalEvidence reconstructionSupported targetEconomic consequenceAuthorizationControlled actionValidated acknowledgementResolution Receipt
See the Order Resolution proof artifact →
Economic Consequence Control
Economic Consequence Control is an independent pre-execution control discipline for evaluating whether a proposed economically binding action is justified relative to supported alternatives before commitment.
Proposed actionEconomic stateSupported counterfactualsConsequence deltaMaterialityEvidence sufficiencyALLOW / ESCALATE / DENYDecision Receipt
See the canonical ECC discriminant case →
Independent Economic Commitment Control
A control layer that does not choose the procurement or commercial action for an agent. It evaluates a specific proposed economic commitment after the action has been proposed and before execution becomes economically binding.
Supported counterfactual
An economically relevant alternative state or action supported by available evidence. ECC does not treat an agent-declared alternative as automatically sufficient merely because the agent proposed it.
Decision Receipt
A verifiable record of a control decision and the evidence, materiality and decision path supporting it. In ECC, the control outcome is ALLOW, ESCALATE or DENY; execution remains outside the ECC boundary.
Not ECC
- Agent identity or Know Your Agent.
- Delegated authority or spending-limit enforcement.
- Generic runtime permissions or policy compliance.
- Payment authorization or transaction execution.
- Procurement optimization, autonomous sourcing or negotiation.